Wednesday, July 29, 2015

CFL Franchise Focus: Turn of the Century Hall-of-Famers

1896 Baltimore Orioles in their parlor loungewear.

This introduction to the 19th-century Hall-of-Fame team serves as both a salute and a farewell: brought in to the Classic Franchise League to provide some stiff competition for the classic franchises, they have proved to be OVERLY strong and, after some soul-searching, I have decided to remove the club from the league! After 60 games (15 games each against the 1954 Indians, the 1950 Yanks, the 1962 Dodgers, and the 1957 Braves), they are to be "retired" with a .750 winning percentage.  Before dismissing them, let's take a look at their performance:



Some notes about the batters:

- Ed Delahanty, he of the mysterious death in 1903, has been the overall hitting star. With so many great players, I didn't use a set lineup except for those players who pretty consistently delivered. He leads the club in double, homers and RBIs. Though an outfielder mainly, I mostly had him playing first base (for which he was an adequate "3"), providing some relief from an otherwise crowded outfield.
MLB-Ed Delahanty.jpg
Big bad Eddie D. channeling Tony Kubek
- George Davis was my other mainstay. He played shortstop in his career, by and large, but split his time in this league between short and third.

Photo of George Davis
George Davis and his awesome mustache

- Sam Thompson and Hugh Duffy got more time than deserved while Billy Hamilton's time was unfairly curtailed. To be fair, Hamilton's defensive rating (a '3' at all three OF positions) made me a bit nervous, particularly when installed in center.

- Cap Anson would have been a typical choice at firstbase except . . .  except I couldn't let go of my impression of him as being a prime instigator and enforcer of the so-called "color line" that prevented black players from playing alongside whites. So, I sat him. There. How do you like it, Cap? 



Pitcher observations:

- A 2.69 team ERA is awfully impressive against any competition and, of course, even more so given top-notch offenses these pitchers faced. In fact, their pitching dominance is what convinced me to pull the plug on this team just before they were about to face the 1962 Mets.

- Mickey Welch lost his last start after winning 7 straight. 

- Tim Keefe not only went 12-0 but fell one inning short of 12 straight complete games. Which shouldn't surprise anyone - in 1883 he started and completed 68 games while compiling 619 innings pitched. In one summer. I know the game was different then . . .  but c'mon! It must have been the 'stache:

Photo of Tim KeefeJamesFinlaysonPublicityHeadshot.jpg
Tim Keefe (left): inspiration for James Finlayson (right)?


So say "Hello!" and "So long!" to these 19th-century heroes (and Cap Anson). They were a fun team to manage and a victim of their own success. Had they won 2 of every 3 (as opposed to 3 of every 4) I quite likely would have kept them in the league.


2 comments:

  1. Love this team concept. I actually have put together the same team and have the club set to play a best-of-seven vs. the All-Century Team. Game One went to the Turn of Century HOF'ers, 9-4. The game was 1-0 in favor of the ACT before things unraveled for Cy Young and then Christy Matthewson. Looking forward to putting this team up against some other teams too, perhaps from the Negro Stars card set.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the comments, Patrick! I was most surprised at the pitching, doubting from the start, that the 19th-century performances would translate well. One suggestion would be to use Kid Nichols more - I had him in a computer-based Strat league and he was very effective. One last thought: I think Strat was overly generous with the error ratings for these guys. I know they did a lot of research (way more than me, obviously) and that the ratings are pro-rated for more modern eras. Still, some of the error ratings were exceptionally low and it felt like the normalizations were too aggressive.

      Anyway, I hope you check in on this blog every now and again.

      Delete